• Home
  • AeroFacts
  • Forum
  • Photos
  • Archive
  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • ComputersOur overlords
  • DefenseThe Russians are coming
  • EconomyWhy you don't have money
  • PersonalThings you don' wanna know
  • PoliticsOur fantasy world
  • SocietyYou and your mother-in-law

Let Me Tell You…

Posted on February 6, 2010 - by Venik

Sukhoi Stealth Fighter’s First Flight

Defense Featured Russia
Sukhoi Stealth Fighter’s First Flight

As many of you already know, last week the Sukhoi T-50 stealth fighter prototype – Russia’s long-awaited answer to Lockheed-Martin’s F-22 – completed it’s maiden 47-minute flight from the manufacturer’s test airfield in the Russian Far East. The single-seat aircraft features low-observable geometry, two widely-separated engines with 3-D thrust-vectoring nozzles,  internal weapons bays, all-movable angled vertical stabilizers, and variable-incidence LERX. The official Sukhoi video of the first flight is available here.

A total of three prototypes have been completed so far: static, runway testing and flying. Photos of two of them have been published.  The black lines on the vertical stabilizers visible on some photos are pressure feedback sensors used to fine-tune the aircraft’s fly-by-wire system. The large internal weapons bays are about six meters long. A very large HUD can be seen on some photos.

The Sukhoi T-50 (aka PAK FA) has a large proportion of all-new systems and components. The aircraft uses new Saturn engines, new integrated fly-by-wire system, new APAA radar, and a new optical detection pod. The aircraft is expected to enter service in 2015. Nothing is known at the moment about the aircraft’s target production cost. The PAK FA is expected to be produced jointly with India.

Even though most of T-50’s technical characteristics remain classified, some performance figures can be estimated based on the Russian Air Force requirements for the PAK FA project, the engine diameter, the size and key features of the airframe. The question currently burning holes through many aviation-related forums is: how would T-50 compare to its main rival – the F-22 Raptor? It is important to keep in mind that F-22 has been flying for a number of years now. The T-50 was deigned to outperform the F-22 is certain aspects considered to be key by the Russian Air Force.

The new Sukhoi fighter is about the same size and weight as the F-22, but T-50’s new Saturn engines are more powerful. This would give the Russian fighter higher thrust-to-weight ratio, faster climb rate, and higher top speed. Because of T-50’s 3-D thrust vectoring, all-movable vertical stabilizers and large variable-incidence leading edge root extensions the aircraft is expected to be more maneuverable than the F-22. The Sukhoi plane also has a higher-caliber cannon and more weapons stations – both internal and external.

Having said this, it is definitely too early to seriously compare the F-22 to the T-50. Nothing – not even the model name – is known about T-50’s new engines. Very little is know about the airframe materials and their proportions. These two missing key pieces of information make estimating T-50’s performance a highly theoretical exercise.  Superimposing the basic shapes of the F-22 and the T-50, it is apparent that, while similar in size, the Russian fighter has a much greater combined area of control surfaces. The T-50 also has more internal space for weapons and fuel, as well as larger air intakes for its more powerful engines.

[Show as slideshow]
pakfa3
pakfa4
pakfa5
pakfabodegas
Print
pakfayf23f22f35
pfffcopy
so1u6p
spl6802_su
srawni
vetical1
vetical2
winghydrolics
zsh10wsura
◄123

Related posts:

  1. Sukhoi T-50 Production and Procurement Details
  2. The Joint Strike Fighter Dilemma
  3. Mistral for Russia
  4. Combat Aviation 2030
  5. Jane’s is Jumping to Conclusions

This entry was posted on Saturday, February 6th, 2010 at 6:06 pm and is filed under Defense, Featured, Russia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



  1. Visit My Website

    February 7, 2010

    Permalink

    Hinkster said:

    Looks promising. Any word on whether the pitot tube seen on the third picture will be removed after testing? It would seem that have such and obstruction would be detrimental to the stealth characteristics of the plane.

    Reply

    Venik Reply:
    February 9th, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    It’s needed for testing. If you look at the photos of YF-22 and early production F-22, the tube is there as well. It is removed on the in-service models.

    Reply



  2. Visit My Website

    February 7, 2010

    Permalink

    Sam Smithson said:

    LOL. Judging by your images and commentary you and I must hang out on the same forums!

    The T-50 is a great technical achievement for Russia, but it a new, complicated and expensive piece of engineering. It would be nice if bringing it to fruition on schedule could be free of the cost overruns, funding problems and unforeseen tech glitches that tend to plague similar big and expensive projects world-wide, and which have certainly plagued other big Russian tech projects in the past. One can only hope.

    Reply



  3. Visit My Website

    February 9, 2010

    Permalink

    vineyardsaker said:

    Do you have any comments about the likely RCS (in particular front and lateral) of the PAKFA as compared to, say, the F-22A and F-35?

    Reply

    Venik Reply:
    February 9th, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    It’s not possible to estimate RCS just by looking at an aircraft. Something that looks “stealthy” may in fact light up the radar screen like a city bus. The most popular software used in the aerospace industry both in the US and in Russia for RCS analysis (among other CEM applications) is FEKO by a South African software maker EMSS. This is very advanced software that can take a 3-D aircraft model (made with a program like Dassault ’s Catia, used by Lockheed, Boeing and Sukhoi) and analyze RCS from various sides for a range of frequencies. This usually requires a supercomputer or an HPC cluster. Even with this tool, fighter aircraft manufacturers perform extensive testing.

    The T-50 has many recognizable LO characteristics, but it’s impossible to say how effective they are. We should also keep in mind that this is the first flying prototype and that the appearance of the aircraft will undergo many changes over the next five years.

    The wide spacing of the engines is a very interesting design feature. It offers many advantages in terms of maneuverability, survivability and internal weapons and fuel storage capacity. However, such an engine arrangement is usually not associated with LO geometry. But then again, it’s impossible to make a reasonable prediction about an aircraft’s RCS just by looking at it.

    Reply



Leave a Comment

Here's your chance to speak.

  1. Name

    Mail

    Website

    Message

Click to cancel reply
  • Related Posts

  • Russia’s stealth fighter

    The Sukhoi PAK FA is a fifth generation fighter aircraft being developed by Sukhoi OKB for the Russian Air Force. The current prototype is Sukhoi's T-50. The PAK FA when fully developed is intended to replace the MiG-29 Fulcrum and Su-27 Flanker in the Russian inventory and serve as the basis of the Sukhoi/HAL FGFA project being developed with India.
  • Slideshow

      Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Sukhoi T-50 first flight

  • Latest News

    • Boris Berezovsky wins libel case over Litvinenko murder
    • Alexander Litvinenko’s family refused refugee status due to EU rules, Italy says
    • Luke Harding on Litvinenko family’s failed attempt to find refuge in Italy
    • Alexander Litvinenko’s father finds little sanctuary in Italy
    • Working outdoors reduces male kidney cancer risk, study says
    • Working outdoors reduces men’s risk of kidney cancer, study says
    • FC Moscow go out of business after owners pull plug on funding
    • Saakashvili to submit to a drug test?
    • Viktor Yanukovych promises Ukraine will embrace Russia
    • Georgia’s olive branch, Russia’s call | Giorgi Badridze
    • Talking to Iran has helped the US | Samuel Charap and Brian Katulis
    • Reaching out to Iran has helped the US | Samuel Charap and Brian Katulis
  • Recent Comments

    • vineyardsaker: Also – if the goal is to transport naval infantry units, would ekranoplans not be a better...
    • vineyardsaker: Sorry for being so obtuse, but I still don’t get the rationale for these ships. Why get 4 French...
    • vineyardsaker: I wonder why they are ordering four Mistrals? One for each fleet? What is the rationale for that...
    • Leni: I enjoy your articles but there seem to be some inconsistencies in this one. At one point you say: “I do...
    • Anonymous: Hi! What about plasma stealth? Did the Russians change their mind about using it? What about the avionics?...
  • Abkhazia Black Sea Bush cluster bomb Defense economic crisis European Union gazprom Georgia Gordon Brown kremlin Lavrov London Medvedev missile Moscow nabucco pipeline NATO obama political weakness Putin Rice Russia russian air force russian media russians Saakashvili Sarkozy soldiers South Ossetia sukhoi t-50 tanks Tbilisi Timoshenko troops Tskhinvali Ukraine us department of state war war in afghanistan warships Washington Yanukovich Yushchenko

    WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

  • RSS Russia Today News

  • Site stats

    Politics
    Top Blogs
    Blog Ratings
© 2008 Let Me Tell You… - World politics: gripes, grumbles, and occasional analysis