• Home
  • AeroFacts
  • Forum
  • Photos
  • Archive
  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • ComputersOur overlords
  • DefenseThe Russians are coming
  • EconomyWhy you don't have money
  • PersonalThings you don't wanna know
  • PoliticsOur fantasy world
  • SocietyYou and your mother-in-law

Let Me Tell You…

Posted on February 6, 2010 - by Venik

Sukhoi Stealth Fighter’s First Flight

Defense Featured Russia
Sukhoi Stealth Fighter’s First Flight

As many of you already know, last week the Sukhoi T-50 stealth fighter prototype – Russia’s long-awaited answer to Lockheed-Martin’s F-22 – completed it’s maiden 47-minute flight from the manufacturer’s test airfield in the Russian Far East. The single-seat aircraft features low-observable geometry, two widely-separated engines with 3-D thrust-vectoring nozzles,  internal weapons bays, all-movable angled vertical stabilizers, and variable-incidence LERX. The official Sukhoi video of the first flight is available here.

A total of three prototypes have been completed so far: static, runway testing and flying. Photos of two of them have been published.  The black lines on the vertical stabilizers visible on some photos are pressure feedback sensors used to fine-tune the aircraft’s fly-by-wire system. The large internal weapons bays are about six meters long. A very large HUD can be seen on some photos.

The Sukhoi T-50 (aka PAK FA) has a large proportion of all-new systems and components. The aircraft uses new Saturn engines, new integrated fly-by-wire system, new APAA radar, and a new optical detection pod. The aircraft is expected to enter service in 2015. Nothing is known at the moment about the aircraft’s target production cost. The PAK FA is expected to be produced jointly with India.

Even though most of T-50′s technical characteristics remain classified, some performance figures can be estimated based on the Russian Air Force requirements for the PAK FA project, the engine diameter, the size and key features of the airframe. The question currently burning holes through many aviation-related forums is: how would T-50 compare to its main rival – the F-22 Raptor? It is important to keep in mind that F-22 has been flying for a number of years now. The T-50 was deigned to outperform the F-22 in certain aspects considered to be key by the Russian Air Force.

The new Sukhoi fighter is about the same size and weight as the F-22, but T-50′s new Saturn engines are more powerful. This would give the Russian fighter higher thrust-to-weight ratio, faster climb rate, and higher top speed. Because of T-50′s 3-D thrust vectoring, all-movable vertical stabilizers and large variable-incidence leading edge root extensions the aircraft is expected to be significantly more maneuverable than the F-22. The Sukhoi plane also has a higher-caliber cannon and more weapons stations – both internal and external.

Having said this, it is definitely too early to seriously compare the F-22 to the T-50. Nothing – not even the model name – is known about T-50′s new engines. Very little is know about the airframe materials and their proportions. These two missing key pieces of information make estimating T-50′s performance a highly theoretical exercise.  Superimposing the basic shapes of the F-22 and the T-50, it is apparent that, while similar in size, the Russian fighter has a much greater combined area of control surfaces. The T-50 also has more internal space for weapons and fuel, as well as larger air intakes for its more powerful engines.

[Show as slideshow]
03aafd9065b181xl
0_44239_90f8bc7a_xl
10414033
1d5842e9f539
201001291030avisnapshot
24e4bfa44db1
2e5od4z
2fighters
2lvzgq0
2nb535f
2rxcm7k
330gqp5
43590842
463cbb4d02af
48917340b3b6
510g
5ydert
8761d6ae377e
97663200
attachment
123►

Popularity: 22% [?]

  • bebo Share on bebo
  • blogger Blog this!
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • myspace Share via MySpace
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Related posts:

  1. Sukhoi T-50 Production and Procurement Details
  2. Iran’s New Stealth UAV
  3. Su-35 Crashed in Russia
  4. Mistral for Russia
  5. Gyrocopter world flight bid – interactive

This entry was posted on Saturday, February 6th, 2010 at 6:06 pm and is filed under Defense, Featured, Russia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



  1. Visit My Website

    February 7, 2010

    Permalink

    Hinkster said:

    Looks promising. Any word on whether the pitot tube seen on the third picture will be removed after testing? It would seem that have such and obstruction would be detrimental to the stealth characteristics of the plane.

    Reply

    Venik Reply:
    February 9th, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    It’s needed for testing. If you look at the photos of YF-22 and early production F-22, the tube is there as well. It is removed on the in-service models.

    Reply



  2. Visit My Website

    February 7, 2010

    Permalink

    Sam Smithson said:

    LOL. Judging by your images and commentary you and I must hang out on the same forums!

    The T-50 is a great technical achievement for Russia, but it a new, complicated and expensive piece of engineering. It would be nice if bringing it to fruition on schedule could be free of the cost overruns, funding problems and unforeseen tech glitches that tend to plague similar big and expensive projects world-wide, and which have certainly plagued other big Russian tech projects in the past. One can only hope.

    Reply



  3. Visit My Website

    February 9, 2010

    Permalink

    vineyardsaker said:

    Do you have any comments about the likely RCS (in particular front and lateral) of the PAKFA as compared to, say, the F-22A and F-35?

    Reply

    Venik Reply:
    February 9th, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    It’s not possible to estimate RCS just by looking at an aircraft. Something that looks “stealthy” may in fact light up the radar screen like a city bus. The most popular software used in the aerospace industry both in the US and in Russia for RCS analysis (among other CEM applications) is FEKO by a South African software maker EMSS. This is very advanced software that can take a 3-D aircraft model (made with a program like Dassault ‘s Catia, used by Lockheed, Boeing and Sukhoi) and analyze RCS from various sides for a range of frequencies. This usually requires a supercomputer or an HPC cluster. Even with this tool, fighter aircraft manufacturers perform extensive testing.

    The T-50 has many recognizable LO characteristics, but it’s impossible to say how effective they are. We should also keep in mind that this is the first flying prototype and that the appearance of the aircraft will undergo many changes over the next five years.

    The wide spacing of the engines is a very interesting design feature. It offers many advantages in terms of maneuverability, survivability and internal weapons and fuel storage capacity. However, such an engine arrangement is usually not associated with LO geometry. But then again, it’s impossible to make a reasonable prediction about an aircraft’s RCS just by looking at it.

    Reply



Leave a Comment

Here's your chance to speak.

  1. Name

    Mail

    Website

    Message

Click to cancel reply
  • Grozny in 2010

    Photos of Grozny in 2010 by photographer Ilya Varlamov
  • Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Grozny Today

    Over the past decade Russia spent billions rebuilding Grozny following the two wars against Chechen separatists. Today the city looks far better than it did at any time in its troubled past.
  • Latest News

    • BRIC countries lead advertising growth
    • Putin’s veto sets Russia apart | David Hearst
    • Syria’s murderous regime is doomed, says defiant William Hague
    • Russia’s veto on Syria sidelines UN as diplomatic options run out
    • Syria resolution vetoed by Russia and China at United Nations
    • Anti-Putin protesters march through Moscow
    • Russians protest against Putin – in pictures
    • Anti-Putin protests draw up to 100,000 in Moscow
    • Syria: more than 200 dead after ‘massacre’ in Homs
    • Syria: over 200 dead after ‘massacre’ in Homs
    • Pussy Riot’s Kremlin protest owes much to riot grrrl | Laura Barton
    • European cold snap threatens energy crisis as death toll rises
  • Recent Comments

    • kvs: A couple of demonstrations drawing 30,000 people are not “mass demonstrations”. This is a drop in...
    • kvs: What’s there to smear? This street thug got six months of training in the US at Yale. Imagine US...
    • kvs: From her first line this bimbo establishes herself as a tin foil hat schizo. Why quote such drivel? Because it...
    • kvs: Navalny is a street hoodlum. There are plenty of youtube videos of this punk and his rants. And the west expects...
    • kvs: Simply incredible. In a country of 142 million people we have the western media monkeys jumping up and down,...
  • Abkhazia assange Black Sea Bush Defense department of state European Union Georgia Gordon Brown interview julian assange kremlin Lavrov leak London Medvedev missile Moscow NATO obama Putin Rice Russia russian air force russians Saakashvili SAM Sarkozy soldiers South Ossetia sukhoi t-50 tanks Tbilisi Timoshenko troops Tskhinvali Ukraine US us department of state war Washington WikiLeaks Yanukovich Yushchenko

    WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

  • RSS News from Russia

    • Fire at Moscow nuclear institute, Russia says no risk (Reuters) February 5, 2012
      MOSCOW (Reuters) – There was no risk of a radiation leak after a fire broke out at a Moscow nuclear research center housing a non-operational 60-year-old atomic reactor Sunday, said officials, but Greenpeace Russia expressed serious concern about the incident. The fire broke out early Sunday in a part of the Alikhanov Institute of Theoretical and Experimenta […]
    • Anti-Putin protesters show staying power in Russia (Reuters) February 5, 2012
      MOSCOW (Reuters) – Vladimir Putin's opponents vowed on Sunday to press on with demonstrations against his 12-year domination of Russia after tens of thousands attended a march which kept up the momentum of their protest movement. "We'll be back," the organizers said on a social network site, one day after demonstrators defied the cold to […]
    • Moscow support for Assad well-calculated (AP) February 5, 2012
      MOSCOW – By bluntly using its veto power to block a United Nations resolution urging Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down, Russia has shown a willingness to defy the West at a scale rarely seen since the Cold War times. The price Russia will have to pay in international condemnation of its action clearly doesn't seem excessive to the Russian leade […]
    • Russia protest movement shows its staying power with massive rally (The Christian Science Monitor) February 4, 2012
      Moscow – Defying predictions that Russia's protest movement had run out of steam, or that bone-chilling winter cold would keep them away, tens of thousands of people converged on downtown Moscow Saturday to demand fair elections and an end to political corruption.       Estimates of the pro-democracy crowd ranged from […]
    • Russians stage rival protests over Putin (Reuters) February 4, 2012
      MOSCOW (Reuters) – Tens of thousands of Russians defied bitter cold in Moscow on Saturday to demand fair elections in a march against Vladimir Putin's 12-year rule, while supporters of the prime minister staged a rival rally drawing comparable numbers. Smaller protests were held in other cities across the vast country maintaining pressure on Putin one m […]
  • Site stats

    Politics
    Top Blogs
    Blog Ratings
© 2008 Let Me Tell You… - World politics: gripes, grumbles, and occasional analysis
  • follow:follow:
  • RSS RSS