• Home
  • AeroFacts
  • Forum
  • Photos
  • Archive
  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • ComputersOur overlords
  • DefenseThe Russians are coming
  • EconomyWhy you don't have money
  • PersonalThings you don' wanna know
  • PoliticsOur fantasy world
  • SocietyYou and your mother-in-law

Let Me Tell You…

Posted on May 17, 2009 - by Venik

Pipeline Business

Economy European Union Featured Russia
Pipeline Business

The EU continues waging a losing battle for its energy independence from Russia. Gazprom, hit hard by the global economic recession and dropping energy demands, may be skating on thin ice, but it is still well ahead of the EU.

Following the August war with Georgia, Russia moved to consolidate its gains in the region and signed a long-term contract to buy gas from Turkmenistan. Two months later global economy collapsed and Gazprom found itself paying 34 cents per cubic meter of imported Turkmen gas, while selling the same to the EU for an average of 28 cents. Not a particularly profitable deal.

Gazprom acknowledged losing money on its Central Asian contracts, but remained optimistic about rising global demand for natural gas. Also, the price Turkmenistan charges Russia for its gas is set for every year and is based on the price of oil with a six-month delay. Thus, should oil prices remain low, Gazprom will pay considerably less for Turkmen gas in 2010 and even a modest increase in demand will allow it to make up for losses in 2009.

Eurasia natural gas pipeline network

Eurasia natural gas pipeline network

In early April, an accident crippled the pipeline in Turkmenistan, halting gas supplies to Russia. Turkmen officials accused Gazprom of shutting the main valve and creating overpressure in the pipeline, leading to the explosion. Gazprom denied any wrongdoing and a number of independent experts confirmed that closing the valve – if it was in fact closed – would not have caused the explosion. Gazprom blamed the accident on Turkmenistan and its decrepit gas pipeline infrastructure and poor maintenance – all valid points Turkmenistan cannot easily deny.

Whatever was the case, in mid-April angry Turkmenistan awarded German RWE AG – a partner in the Nabucco pipeline project – an exploration contract. This contract is relatively short-term and limited in scope, but this was the biggest victory Nabucco proponents have had in years. The EU decided to press on with the project by signing an agreement with Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey and Egypt. Signatures of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and, most notably, Turkmenistan were missing. Moreover, the president of Turkmenistan chose not to even attend the meeting.

The EU’s position is: let’s start building the pipeline and, perhaps, Turkmenistan will eventually change its mind. A sound business model, to be sure. Meanwhile, Gazprom moved quickly to sign an agreement with Italy, Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia to double the capacity of the South Stream pipeline. This will allow Russia to half the amount of gas it sends to Europe via Ukraine. The Nord Stream pipeline currently under construction at the bottom of the Baltic Sea should take care of the other half, leaving Ukraine in a pickle. Additionally, Russia extended contracts to supply gas to Turkey via the Blue Stream pipeline and started negotiations on building the Blue Stream 2, which will take Russian gas to Europe and, in the future, to Israel.

The alternatives to EU’s Nabucco are many and almost every single one of them is far more practical and economically feasible. The EU’s yearly consumption of natural gas is about 600 bcm per year. Without Turkmenistan’s participation, the Nabucco pipeline will depend entirely on Azerbaijan, which can supply only 10 bcm per year – less than two percent of the overall volume. This is not much of a diversification for the billions of dollars to be spent on the pipeline. The only other country in the region that has enough gas to make the Nabucco project viable is Iran. I am sure you can see the problem with that. And even if the EU was willing to do more business with Iran, there are no guarantees that Iran will be similarly inclined.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Related posts:

  1. Pipeline to Nowhere
  2. A tale of two pipelines | Ian Bancroft
  3. China signs deal for 30 years of Turkmen gas
  4. Paying Ukraine’s Gas Bill
  5. Russia agrees deal with Turkey for gas pipeline

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 17th, 2009 at 6:01 pm and is filed under Economy, European Union, Featured, Russia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

0 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



Leave a Comment

Here's your chance to speak.

  1. Name

    Mail

    Website

    Message

Click to cancel reply
  • Related Posts

  • Russia’s stealth fighter

    The Sukhoi PAK FA is a fifth generation fighter aircraft being developed by Sukhoi OKB for the Russian Air Force. The current prototype is Sukhoi's T-50. The PAK FA when fully developed is intended to replace the MiG-29 Fulcrum and Su-27 Flanker in the Russian inventory and serve as the basis of the Sukhoi/HAL FGFA project being developed with India.
  • Slideshow

      Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
  • Sukhoi T-50 first flight

  • Latest News

    • Boris Berezovsky wins libel case over Litvinenko murder
    • Alexander Litvinenko’s family refused refugee status due to EU rules, Italy says
    • Luke Harding on Litvinenko family’s failed attempt to find refuge in Italy
    • Alexander Litvinenko’s father finds little sanctuary in Italy
    • Working outdoors reduces male kidney cancer risk, study says
    • Working outdoors reduces men’s risk of kidney cancer, study says
    • FC Moscow go out of business after owners pull plug on funding
    • Saakashvili to submit to a drug test?
    • Viktor Yanukovych promises Ukraine will embrace Russia
    • Georgia’s olive branch, Russia’s call | Giorgi Badridze
    • Talking to Iran has helped the US | Samuel Charap and Brian Katulis
    • Reaching out to Iran has helped the US | Samuel Charap and Brian Katulis
  • Recent Comments

    • vineyardsaker: Also – if the goal is to transport naval infantry units, would ekranoplans not be a better...
    • vineyardsaker: Sorry for being so obtuse, but I still don’t get the rationale for these ships. Why get 4 French...
    • vineyardsaker: I wonder why they are ordering four Mistrals? One for each fleet? What is the rationale for that...
    • Leni: I enjoy your articles but there seem to be some inconsistencies in this one. At one point you say: “I do...
    • Anonymous: Hi! What about plasma stealth? Did the Russians change their mind about using it? What about the avionics?...
  • Abkhazia Black Sea Bush cluster bomb Defense economic crisis European Union gazprom Georgia Gordon Brown kremlin Lavrov London Medvedev missile Moscow nabucco pipeline NATO obama political weakness Putin Rice Russia russian air force russian media russians Saakashvili Sarkozy soldiers South Ossetia sukhoi t-50 tanks Tbilisi Timoshenko troops Tskhinvali Ukraine us department of state war war in afghanistan warships Washington Yanukovich Yushchenko

    WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.

  • RSS Russia Today News

  • Site stats

    Politics
    Top Blogs
    Blog Ratings
© 2008 Let Me Tell You… - World politics: gripes, grumbles, and occasional analysis